[Compromising due to additive cerclages : Can surgical treatment of humeral shaft fractures cause damage to the radial nerve?] / Kompromittierung durch additive Cerclagen : Ist der N. radialis in der operativen Versorgung der Humerusschaftfraktur in Gefahr?

BACKGROUND: In many cases the treatment of humeral shaft fractures is challenging and despite the large diversity of available approaches, no standard treatment exists. In addition to conservative treatment, intramedullary nails and plate osteosynthesis are competing methods for healing humeral shaft fractures. Furthermore, cerclage is considered to be an additive treatment for spiral fractures; however, this also increases the risk of radial nerve neuropathy and is said to compromise the perfusion of bone fragments. The goal of this study was to investigate secondary radial nerve neuropathy using additive and limited invasive cerclages for nail osteosynthesis of humeral shaft fractures. METHODS: In the present study a total of 102 patients with humeral shaft fractures were clinically and neurologically re-examined after having been treated with nail osteosynthesis and additive cerclage via a limited invasive access over the past 5 years. In total 193 cerclages with limited invasive access were inserted during this time period. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Of the patients four (3.9%) showed a secondary radial neuropathy during operative stabilization. Neurophysiological and neurosonographic examinations revealed that this had not been caused by compromising, embedding or severance of the radial nerve due to the cerclage. Two out of these nerve lesions recovered spontaneously within 3 and 6 months, respectively. The other two cases could not be documented over a period of 12 months due to death of the patient. With 3.9% of iatrogenic radial nerve lesions the rate of nerve lesions falls into the lower range of that which has previously been described in the literature for nerve lesions due to operative treatment of humeral shaft fractures (3-12%). We thus conclude that there is no increased risk for iatrogenic injury of the radial nerve using additive and limited invasive cerclage.

[Intraosseous foreign body or osteoma : Challenging differential diagnosis after open radius fracture]. / Intraossärer Fremdkörper oder Osteom : Anspruchsvolle Differenzialdiagnose nach offener Radiusfraktur.

Presentation of a 16-year-old male patient due to a cycling accident while mountain biking 14 days after primary treatment after open epiphyseal injury. Metaphyseal intraosseous stones within the anatomically reduced distal radius fracture were misinterpreted as an incidental osteoma.